.png)
.png)
.png)
Join 100 districts shaping the future of teacher development — with evidence your schools and community can trust.
Enrollment closes October 28, 2025.










Enroll by Oct. 28, 2025 — fall cohort limited to 30 districts.
Select a focus school or group of classrooms.
Join onboarding and focus groups.
Access the platform and participate in cohort sessions.
Receive interim findings and final report with personalized results review.
Enroll by Oct. 28, 2025 — fall cohort limited to 30 districts.
Select a focus school or group of classrooms.
Join onboarding and focus groups.
Access the platform and participate in cohort sessions.
Receive interim findings and final report with personalized results review.
Cohort participants are invited to participate in (4) collaborative, structured learning sessions. Each session explores one the study's key metrics or subgroup focus areas, with the goal of helping participants explore the benefits and potential drawbacks of AI in the teacher evaluation process. After the cohort concludes, each district will receive a personalized results review meeting (January–April 2026), designed to help their districts turn the research into actionable next steps.
Understand how higher-quality, context-driven evaluation feedback supports professional learning. Examine examples that connect evaluation evidence directly to coaching and PD investments. Explore early signals of growth across districts and subject areas.
Analyze where principals spend their time and identify common bottlenecks. Explore how AI converts low-inference notes into standards-aligned evaluations. Test-drive Swiftscore workflows while capturing data on time-savings and usability.
Discuss how evaluation processes shape teacher perceptions of fairness and respect. Identify the trust signals that matter most (tone, clarity, follow-through). Evaluate whether AI-supported feedback can increase transparency and relational trust.
Participants split into subgroups based on their chosen focus area (e.g., IEPs & Special Education, PD Alignment, Framework Implementation, Legacy Software, Regional Networks). Surface district-specific challenges and opportunities. Provide structured input into how AI can evolv...
Representatives from each participating district will receive a personalized results review — virtual or in-person — where participants can review composite scores and results (TG, PPE, RT), explore specific subgroup findings, and plan next steps.
Understand how higher-quality, context-driven evaluation feedback supports professional learning. Examine examples that connect evaluation evidence directly to coaching and PD investments. Explore early signals of growth across districts and subject areas.
Analyze where principals spend their time and identify common bottlenecks. Explore how AI converts low-inference notes into standards-aligned evaluations. Test-drive Swiftscore workflows while capturing data on time-savings and usability.
Discuss how evaluation processes shape teacher perceptions of fairness and respect. Identify the trust signals that matter most (tone, clarity, follow-through). Evaluate whether AI-supported feedback can increase transparency and relational trust.
Participants split into subgroups based on their chosen focus area (e.g., IEPs & Special Education, PD Alignment, Framework Implementation, Legacy Software, Regional Networks). Surface district-specific challenges and opportunities. Provide structured input into how AI can evolve to meet needs beyond teacher evaluation. Contribute to the national ...
Representatives from each participating district will receive a personalized results review — virtual or in-person — where participants can review composite scores and results (TG, PPE, RT), explore specific subgroup findings, and plan next steps.
Cohort participants are invited to participate in (4) collaborative, structured learning sessions.
Each session explores one the study's key metrics or subgroup focus areas, with the goal of helping participants explore the benefits and potential drawbacks of AI in the teacher evaluation process.
After the cohort concludes, each district will receive a personalized results review meeting (January–April 2026), designed to help their districts turn the research into actionable next steps.
Understand how higher-quality, context-driven evaluation feedback supports professional learning. Examine examples that connect evaluation evidence directly to coaching and PD investments. Explore early signals of growth across districts and subject areas.
Analyze where principals spend their time and identify common bottlenecks. Explore how AI converts low-inference notes into standards-aligned evaluations. Test-drive Swiftscore workflows while capturing data on time-savings and usability.
Discuss how evaluation processes shape teacher perceptions of fairness and respect. Identify the trust signals that matter most (tone, clarity, follow-through). Evaluate whether AI-supported feedback can increase transparency and relational trust.
Participants split into subgroups based on their chosen focus area (e.g., IEPs & Special Education, PD Alignment, Framework Implementation, Legacy Software, Regional Networks). Surface district-specific challenges and opportunities. Provide structured input into how AI can evolv...
Representatives from each participating district will receive a personalized results review — virtual or in-person — where participants can review composite scores and results (TG, PPE, RT), explore specific subgroup findings, and plan next steps.
Understand how higher-quality, context-driven evaluation feedback supports professional learning. Examine examples that connect evaluation evidence directly to coaching and PD investments. Explore early signals of growth across districts and subject areas.
Analyze where principals spend their time and identify common bottlenecks. Explore how AI converts low-inference notes into standards-aligned evaluations. Test-drive Swiftscore workflows while capturing data on time-savings and usability.
Discuss how evaluation processes shape teacher perceptions of fairness and respect. Identify the trust signals that matter most (tone, clarity, follow-through). Evaluate whether AI-supported feedback can increase transparency and relational trust.
Participants split into subgroups based on their chosen focus area (e.g., IEPs & Special Education, PD Alignment, Framework Implementation, Legacy Software, Regional Networks). Surface district-specific challenges and opportunities. Provide structured input into how AI can evolve to meet needs beyond teacher evaluation. Contribute to the national ...
Representatives from each participating district will receive a personalized results review — virtual or in-person — where participants can review composite scores and results (TG, PPE, RT), explore specific subgroup findings, and plan next steps.
Cut through the noise of vendor pilots by joining a structured, evidence-driven study.
Emerge with a full report featuring national, regional, and district-specific findings - evidence you can present with confidence to your board and community., evidence-driven study.
Work alongside other district leaders tackling the same challenges of efficiency, trust, and growth.
Contribute to how AI can be used: not as a simple time-saver, but as a tool for connection and impact.
Every district receives access to Swiftscore's AI-powered teacher evaluation platform. Reduce evaluation time, deepen coaching, and see how technology can return educators to the work they came to do.
Cut through the noise of vendor pilots by joining a structured, evidence-driven study.
Emerge with a full report featuring national, regional, and district-specific findings - evidence you can present with confidence to your board and community., evidence-driven study.
Work alongside other district leaders tackling the same challenges of efficiency, trust, and growth.
Contribute to how AI can be used: not as a simple time-saver, but as a tool for connection and impact.
Every district receives access to Swiftscore's AI-powered teacher evaluation platform. Reduce evaluation time, deepen coaching, and see how technology can return educators to the work they came to do.

Composite findings for Principal Performance & Efficiency (PPE), Relational Trust (RT), and Teacher Growth (TG).
PPE: Efficiency that gives leaders time back to lead.
RT: Trust that restores connection between principals and teachers.
TG: Growth that reignites the purpose of teaching.
Sub-metrics detailing efficiency, reliability, fairness, and coaching impact.
Comparative insights against traditional evaluation processes, general AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.), and legacy software platforms.
Clear data points tied to your selected focus area.

Composite findings for Principal Performance & Efficiency (PPE), Relational Trust (RT), and Teacher Growth (TG).
PPE: Efficiency that gives leaders time back to lead.
RT: Trust that restores connection between principals and teachers.
TG: Growth that reignites the purpose of teaching.
Sub-metrics detailing efficiency, reliability, fairness, and coaching impact.
Comparative insights against traditional evaluation processes, general AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.), and legacy software platforms.
Clear data points tied to your selected focus area.

Enrollment deadline: Oct. 28, 2025 — one week prior to cohort launch
Participation can be supported through:
IEP and Special education budgets
Title II and Title IV funds
Professional development budgets
Innovation or AI-specific grants
Regional service center allocations

Enrollment deadline: Oct. 28, 2025 — one week prior to cohort launch
Participation can be supported through:
IEP and Special education budgets
Title II and Title IV funds
Professional development budgets
Innovation or AI-specific grants
Regional service center allocations
Lead with evidence. Rebuild trust. Give your educators the freedom to grow.
Lead with evidence. Rebuild trust. Give your educators the freedom to grow.


